Screens & Childhood

Home / A parent question / Games & choices

A parent question / Games & choices

Read the little words beside the game rating.

The age category is one part of the label. Check content, interaction, and purchases before you decide.

Use the rating as a starting point

You have found a game your child wants to play. The age symbol looks straightforward, but you still have questions: who can talk to them, what can they buy, and what will the game actually show? Those questions deserve separate answers.

This guide uses the ESRB system, commonly encountered in North America. Other regions use other rating systems. Check the label for the version and store you are using rather than converting a rating from another region by guesswork.

Read three layers

The ESRB ratings guide distinguishes rating categories, content descriptors, and interactive elements. The category suggests age appropriateness. Descriptors explain aspects of the content. Interactive elements identify features such as user interaction and in-game purchases; ESRB says these do not influence its rating assignment.

That means an age category does not answer every question about the online experience. Read the accompanying words, then investigate the particular features you need to understand. A label is useful information, not a personalised assessment of your child.

Three separate questions: What content is here? Who can interact? What can be purchased?

Look beyond the existence of chat

ESRB’s “Users Interact” element identifies the possibility of exchanging content with other users. It does not tell you the exact conversation your child will have. Look at the current game and account settings to understand which features are available.

Before you decide, write down practical questions: is there text or voice chat? Can it be limited? Does the game use its own settings, the device account’s settings, or both? Can you find the controls you intend to use while signed into the relevant account? If you cannot confirm the answer, leave it open rather than treating a guess as a setting.

Separate the game price from offers inside it

ESRB identifies in-game purchases, including a separate description for purchases containing random items. Check those labels even if the download itself has no upfront charge. The store price and the offers encountered during play describe different parts of the experience.

Our practical suggestion is to agree who can approve a purchase and then inspect the account’s purchasing controls. Ask your child to show you how an offer appears in the game. Translate virtual-currency prices into a real-money amount together when you are considering a purchase. This is a conversation exercise, not a claim about a specific game’s pricing.

Preview the part your child wants to play

A trailer may show a different mode from the one your child’s friends use. Ask them to describe what they want to do: build privately, join a public match, create a character, or play beside someone in the same room. Use that description to guide what you inspect.

If you can preview the relevant mode together, note what you still do not understand. Look for text size, controls, invitations, offers, and where a session can stop. These observations help you make a household decision without turning a rating symbol into a promise it never made.

Keep the decision specific

Write a simple decision: which game, which account, which mode, who can approve spending, and when to revisit the arrangement. If a feature changes, that record tells you what to check again. Avoid promising that a particular configuration eliminates every risk.

You can add the agreement to the family plan worksheet. If you want more guidance, start with the rating organisation’s own explanations and the current support pages for the game or device. This article explains how to read information; it does not certify individual games or make claims about their effects on development.

Sources & context

Source links checked 15 September 2026. This guide combines the cited material with editorial planning suggestions. Examples are illustrative; they are not reported experiences or test results.

Suggest a correction · Read our editorial approach